CVE-2026-98861
UnratedPublished 2026-10-18
CVSS
—
Unrated
EPSS
—
exploit probability
Active Exploit
No
not yet listed
What is CVE-2026-98861?
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fprobe: Use guard(rcu_sched_notrace) and check rcu_is_watching() unregister_fprobe() and unregister_fprobe_async() (used by BPF kprobe-multi) rely on standard RCU grace periods (synchronize_rcu() and call_rcu()) to wait until in-flight fprobe handlers complete before freeing the fprobe. However, if an fprobe handler executes while RCU is not watching (such as in the idle loop or nohz_full extended quiescent states), standard RCU does not track preemption-disabled sections. Consequently, synchronize_rcu() does not wait for those executions, which can lead to a use-after-free if the fprobe is freed immediately after unregistration. Ensure handlers exit early when !rcu_is_watching(). Furthermore, fprobe_fgraph_entry() and fprobe_ftrace_entry() previously used guard(rcu)() and rcu_read_lock(), which invoke lockdep on every hit under CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING. This adds overhead and can cause lockdep recursion if probed functions interact with lockdep. Since rhltable_lookup() and rhl_for_each_entry_rcu() use rcu_dereference_all_check() (which checks rcu_read_lock_any_held()), holding preemption disabled via rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace() is fully valid and sufficient so long as rcu_is_watching() is true. Define and use guard(rcu_sched_notrace)() across fprobe_ftrace_entry(), fprobe_fgraph_entry(), and fprobe_return(). This eliminates fast-path rcu_read_lock() and lockdep overhead while guaranteeing safe grace period synchronization.
CVSS Score Explained
No CVSS score available for this CVE yet.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
No EPSS score yet — model needs more data on this CVE.
References & Patches
- ›https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a85d0f00671b4d4527317c10ba018680f7d8d673
- ›https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd4a0d4993633b45470abf6da4ea0ca563402245
- ›https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e0a6249190402a28f1e2925a81acf573157d55ef
Track vulnerabilities for your stack
Tell us what tech you run — Node.js, Python, Java, nginx, whatever — and get a weekly email when new CVEs affect it.
Recent CVEs
- CVE-2026-105391Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.—
- CVE-2026-107274Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.—
- CVE-2026-107345Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.—
- CVE-2026-107772Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.—
- CVE-2026-108117Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.—
- CVE-2026-111865A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.1.9